Language Learning Talk

The opinions expressed are that of the author and not the Department of Defense, the U.S. Government or the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center

Speaking Practice Environment

May 12, 2010 by · 1 Comment · Uncategorized

Creating Learning Environments:  Web 2.0 in Education and Training

Don Fischer

General Outline

This paper will outline a theory of learning, what is needed to facilitate learning, and discuss the development of a learning environment to facilitate second language speaking practice.  That environment will exploit the availability of Facebook, the capability to upload video and audio to Facebook pages, and, to a certain extent, the capabilities of YouTube.

Theory

Language learning takes place through the interactional instinct outlined by Shuman in his book of the same name. (Lee, Mikesell, Joaquin, Mates, & Shuman, 2009) (Shuman, 2010)  Children are born with an extreme capability to mimic the conspecific that accords them food, shelter, love and various forms of care.  They mimic facial expressions and mimic sounds.  As they advance in language acquisition, they will mimic the speech of the caregiver when alone, because of the pleasing effect of hearing those sounds.  This ability to mimic comes from an extreme loading of chemicals, dopamines that motivate the neonate to survive, and opiates that provide the feeling of success and accomplishment that drive the individual to seek that which is necessary to survive.

Eventually, this process of acquisition, which occurs unconsciously and becomes automatic, implicit knowledge, leads to the non-verbal and verbal icons called language.  Children are built to learn that which allows them to survive.  This capability, this charging of chemicals at levels 100 times that of adults, peaks at a very early age and declines to an operative level around the years eight to 12.  (Lee, Mikesell, Joaquin, Mates, & Shuman, 2009) At this time, language learning becomes more difficult.

Learning a second language becomes a function of declarative knowledge, which is separate from the implicit processes, and the learning takes place in a different way—a way that requires aptitude, opportunity to learn, and motivation—the willingness to memorize and practice to the point of acquiring automaticity in the second language. (Shuman, Crowell, Jones, Lee, Schuchert, & Wood, 2004)

Shuman and his colleagues cite three aspects of brain functioning contributing to the survival and well-being of the individual.  They are: 1) homeostasis—keeping the body in balance; 2) sociostasis—allowing the individual to participate in groups and society; and 3) somatic—the preferences and dislikes acquired over a lifetime. These aspects impart values that generate desires and motivation to achieve goals related to these functions (Shuman, Crowell, Jones, Lee, Schuchert, & Wood, 2004).

Suffice it to say that learning takes place easily when related to need related to these functions.  Externally imposed learning not related to need is much more difficult to accomplish.  Again, we return to the need for aptitude (the ability to learn quickly), opportunity to learn, and motivation which a teacher must inculcate through the presentation of the body of knowledge the individual is “required” to learn.

Shuman’s motivational model states that motivation operates on five planes of stimulus-appraisal (i.e., the assignment of value or biases leading an organism to certain preferences enabling it to choose among alternatives).  Dopamines are produced when

1) When an action is relevant to needs and goals;

2) When a stimulus is novel;

3) When an action promotes positive self and social image;

4) When an action is intrinsically present; and

5) When there is coping-potential.

Opiates are produced when the object of desire is achieved.  The teacher must create an environment where stimuli meet the above criteria and the learner is rewarded in the seeking of whatever the object of stimulation is.  Shuman looks at the foraging instinct, for food, and compares knowledge or skill seeking to that process (Shuman, Crowell, Jones, Lee, Schuchert, & Wood, 2004).

Our task is to take people of reasonable aptitude, provide the opportunity to learn, and provide stimuli that the individual will accord value to, that will generate the dopamines so to speak to pursue the skill or knowledge, and provide the feeling of reward, through the endorphins/opiates, that will further stimulate the seeking.  This project will use the Web 2.0 tools of Facebook and YouTube to provide the opportunity for practice, accountability to both class and teacher, and the visibility of skills acquired and applied to the task of learning a second language.

The Project

From Wikipedia we see that “Web 2.0 consists of web applications that facilitate interactive information sharing, interoperability, user-centered design, and collaboration on the World Wide Web.   A Web 2.0 site allows its users to interact with each other as contributors to the website’s content, in contrast to websites where users are limited to the passive viewing of information that is provided to them. Examples of Web 2.0 include web-based communities, hosted services, web applications, social-networking sites, video-sharing sites, wikis, blogs, mashups, and folksonomies.”  These capabilities can be used to facilitate language learning.

The Need

The Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center must support military forces in the field.  The lessons of having knowledge of the language and culture of the country to which forces are deployed have long been known, but in a basically monolingual country like the United States, the requirement to learn languages and cultures has been minimized, even in places like Germany where years were successfully spent by US Forces.  The Germans learned about our language and our culture, so we did not have to.

New lessons have been learned in Iraq and Afghanistan.  There the populations have not been so hospitable and we have made serious mistakes through assumptions that proved to be false.  Language and cultural knowledge are important.  The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) commander, General Stanley McCrystal, a notable Special Operations soldier, says that language is the key to culture and culture is key to achieving objectives.  He is encouraging, even requiring, every leader from platoon on up, to have a basic language capability.

For adults, acquiring even a basic capability in language is difficult.  There are work and family needs that must be met.  Acquiring a basic capability requires our three factors plus time.  The question is how to get fully occupied soldiers and officers to learn.  An answer can be to use Web 2.0 tools to provide asynchronous opportunity to learn and practice.  The goal will be to achieve an Interagency Language Roundtable (http://www.utm.edu/staff/globeg/ilrspeak.html) Level 1 in speaking proficiency.  The Level 1 speaker:

  • Is able to satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face conversations on familiar topics.
  • Must often use slowed speech, repetition, paraphrase, or a combination of these to be understood by this individual.
  • Must strain and employ real-world knowledge to understand even simple statements/questions from this individual.
  • Has a functional, but limited proficiency.
  • Often experiences and causes misunderstandings.
  • Is able to ask for help and to verify comprehension of native speech in face-to-face interaction.
  • Is unable to produce continuous discourse except with rehearsed material.

Resources

We will use Web 2.0 resources to prove what we hope to be a motivational experience and an available one.  The resources should be readily available anywhere there is an internet lash-up.  The cost should be minimal—preferably free.  Equipment requirements should be minimal and cheap.  We will use Facebook, YouTube (as applicable, not necessary), the Internet, cheap computers such as netbooks, PC, or any Apple machine, and we will use Interagency Roundtable speaking guidelines to structure assessment.

Learning Objectives

The successful learner will:

  • Do simple greetings and introductory statements
  • Ask/tell someone how to get to a nearby hotel
  • Order a simple meal
  • Arrange for a hotel room and taxi ride
  • Buy a needed item such as a bus or train ticket, groceries or clothing
  • Ask about date and place of birth, status, occupation etc
  • Make social introductions and use greeting and leave-taking expressions.
  • Handle conversations about familiar topics
  • In an organized way, produce speech

Instructional Strategy

Facebook Groups will be used to create a virtual classroom.  Videos of speaking practice or assessment will be uploaded from personal computers or through YouTube.  Critiques will be provided by classmates and teachers by also uploading videos or providing YouTube links in the Comments section under each video.  The learner will be advised to repeat to correct problems and errors.  Group participants will benefit from seeing each other and viewing the critiques provided by the proficiency assessor, normally the teacher.

Instructional Design

Students will have their own Facebook page.  The teacher will designate each student as a member of the group.  The group page will appear as part of the member’s Facebook environment.  For this demonstration, it will be assumed that the members have begun the study of German and have made a beginning.  They will have some standard set of learning materials available.  They will discuss Level 1 topics based on the learning objectives shown progressing through the list and  using iMovie, Windows MovieMaker, or YouTube to make a video of their presentation.  They will load the video on the German Classroom page using Facebook.  The teacher will write a critique, create a video link in the comment block to discuss the sample, or upload a video from a personal computer.  Students would be encouraged to repeat the exercise, attending to the assessor’s recommendations.  Assessment of progress would be through structured Oral Proficiency Interviews which are standard practice at the Defense Language Institute.  In the near future, the Institute will produce a Very Low Range assessment system that will test Listening and Reading proficiency.

The reference for this design model is the Intulogy ADDIE approach.

http://www.intulogy.com/addie/discovery.html

Pilot Project Location

The pilot project, German Classroom, is available to class members.

Pilot Project Review

The project works and is capable of sizeable use.  Facebook as the vehicle is somewhat cumbersome.  The system is not designed to be an academic environment, however, it will work.  There are issues with Facebook.  It is potentially leaky in terms of privacy.  The different steps require practice to facilitate use.  One can upload video products through YouTube or from one’s personal computer.  Audio files can only be uploaded from one’s server, not through the Facebook upload procedures.  This lack of ability upload audio files seems like a serious omission.  The system was also used to conduct an Oral Proficiency Interview with a certified tester.  Both individuals were on camera.  Audio and video was excellent.

Overall opinion:  High potential as a means to provide learning opportunity.

Next Steps

This vehicle may be used to monitor progress under any curriculum.  For a German speaking course it would be necessary to collect or produce materials.  Given the availability of a program of instruction, a tabletop review of teaching procedures and methodologies and the integration with various resources would be studied.  Revisions would be made as necessary.

A pilot should be conducted on a larger scale.  The Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center has many relationships with institutions such as the Navy Postgraduate School, the National War College, etc; and to deployed units.  Tests of the system using people deployed to Afghanistan would provide information on system robustness.  The Institute has a very good system of collecting feedback from participating students.

Evaluation and Assessment

Students would be assessed to see if Level 1 was achieved with the many resources available, in particular the standard Institute Oral Proficiency Interview, using Interagency Language Roundtable guidelines that are available through the web.  The Institute Diagnostic Assessment rubric would be used then to develop a learning plan to bring the learner farther along in achieving higher levels of language proficiency.

Feedback from the users would be collected.  A Pashto course conducted over Illuminate with e-mentors was evaluated by the Institute’s Evaluation and Standards Directorate (Berman, 2010).  The same format and approach would be used for a program such as is described.

Summary

In conclusion, use of Facebook and YouTube proved to be cheap, available, and versatile.  Facebook could be used to provide learning related to many disciplines.  In particular, it could be used to make language learning opportunity available to distance students, even with such a production intense learning task as is speaking a new language.  The involvement of group members and a qualified teacher in such an environment provides soft accountability and the motivation that groups can generate.  Practice and timely critique lead to success, success leads to motivation, motivation leads to proficiency.  This small and simple use of Web 2.0 provides one tool to use as an approach to a teaching and learning task.

Works Cited

Berman, S. J. (2010). Pashto Headstart Pilot Program: Results and Recommendations. Course Evaluation, Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center, Research and Analysis Division, Directorate of Evaluation and Standardization, Monterey, CA.

Lee, N., Mikesell, L., Joaquin, A. D., Mates, A. W., & Shuman, J. H. (2009). The Interactional Instinct: The Evolution and acquisition of Language. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.

Shuman, J. H. (2010). A Unified Perspective on First and Second Language Acquisition. Los Angeles, CA.

Shuman, J. H. (1997). The Neurobiology of Affect in Language.

Shuman, J. H., Crowell, S. E., Jones, N. E., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. A., & Wood, L. A. (2004). The Neurobiology of Learning: Perspectives From Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Don’s Web 2.0 Project

March 13, 2010 by · 4 Comments · Uncategorized

Below is my proposal for the Web 2.0 educational project.  Also posted is the litany of challenges already encountered in attempting to find the social networking software/application that could be the scaffold for the environment I am trying to create.

The Proposal:  Develop a virtual classroom where members can meet to post second language speaking practice cuts (audio and video) for collaborative critique by students and teacher. The site will provide a capability to post text to socialize, to express opinions, to allow people to critique each other, and to provide a means of sharing and creating knowledge using problem-based scenarios encouraging research, sharing and comment.

ADDIE elements:

Analysis:  Discussion of need for accountable, mentored practice with positive error correction to develop an environment for speaking, automaticity, and correct speech habits that ward off fossilization.

Design:  The design should permit ease of location and learning of navigation. The design should provide an environment that people seek because of its utility, value in learning a language, accessibility worldwide, low price and effectiveness, and provides positive accountability ensuring the students dothe practice, share with the class, and develop relationships supportive of language learning.  The language used is likely to be German.

Development: The process will support learning about applications, using them, and informing Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center efforts to bring students to high levels of language speaking proficiency.

Implementation:  I will seek students studying German at the Institute to test the site features.

Evaluation:  Using site evaluation rubrics a critique will be prepared.

Challenges to this point:

What I want to do for a project is create a foreign language speaking practice environment using social networking software, originally Facebook.  I was goingto use www.uhaveaudio.com. This application uses Voice Messaging to post a message on your Facebook page.  You call in on your cell phone to a number and the message is stored on the phone server.  Voice Messaging is used to post it to Facebook.  At the same time, one does not have to use that and can relay solely on the cellphone.  One could tell people the number to call and people could leave speech samples or messages.  Foreign language teachers could conceivably call, listen to the sample, and provide a critique which a person could call in to hear.

My vision was having pictures of participants on a Facebook classroom wall that people could click on and hear the speech sample.  Participants would meet at a certain time as friends on the Facebook page and listen to one another and text responses.  The language teacher would text critiques.  This system could work synchronously or asynchronously.  However  the www.uhaveaudio.com would not support this concept.  Each new message would override the old one. Further, posting audio appears to be a problem in Facebook.

So I went to ELGG.  That site did not function.  It was down or gone. That was disappointing after the reading about the site.

Then I went to PeopleAggregator.  I had to use three email addresses and had to post a picture (which the site implied was optional)and had to work through three registrations before I got it to work.  This took hours last weekend and with the Annual Review that took place today, I have not had a chance to work it further, but the site does look as if one can post multiple audio and video files on it.

I am aware that I could do this with Elluminate or Adobe Connect or our system (Broadband Language Training System) but I wish to attempt this on networking applications that are universally accessible and free.

Social Bookmarking Account-http://delicious.com/dfischer1940

March 3, 2010 by · 3 Comments · Uncategorized

Ever-Decreasing Curricula Delivery Tool Size

February 26, 2010 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

From Books to Laser Disk to Tape Cassette to CD to iPod

From Books to Laser Disk to Tape Cassette to CD to MP3 Player with Recorder/Microphone Adapter

The picture illustrates how we can pack a great deal of material in a very small space.  The original “weighty” version of the Arabic curriculum has been transitioned from books to laser disk to tape cassette to Player/Recorder.  Each student gets an MP3 player that holds all the audio, video and text files for the curriculum.

Video Link for week of Feb 17

February 19, 2010 by · 2 Comments · Uncategorized

The link below is to a performance of the group, or should I say organization, “Play for Change” of Bob Marley’s “One Love”.  It is simply great–An international mash-up.  Click on “Play for Change” URLs.  Unbelievable.

Have Fun and be prepared to have “One Love” going through your head for the next year or so…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xjPODksI08

Here is another one: http://www.youtube.com/watch#v=tAjFnJuk1Aw&feature=related

There is much more.  Stand By Me.    Enjoy Washboard Chaz, Grandpa Elliott, Tula, Roberto Luto, the Twin Eagle Drum Group of Zuni, New Mexico, Bill Aura in Nepal, and Clarence Bekker in Amsterdam.  What a world…

http://www.youtube.com/watch#v=Us-TVg40ExM&feature=related

Link to video

February 19, 2010 by · No Comments · Uncategorized

This is a link to a terrific video by Playing for Change; Bob Marley’s One Love.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xjPODksI08

Have fun!  Don

Barbara Vance’s Project

February 16, 2010 by · 1 Comment · Uncategorized

Ms. Vance’s experiment is worthy of the time.  Rhetoric is persuasion and persuasion in this age must go beyond text, back to our primal inputs–the eyes and ears.  Text was a technological breakthrough that allowed reality to be simulated through description.  What we see though is the limited bandwidth of text.  It takes a lot of explaining to get concepts across.  The more complex the concept, the more words it takes unless one is very gifted–poets and the greatest of writers achieve conciseness but the depth contained in the conciseness is beyond the reach of many.  By reliance on text, we exclude many who are gifted who cannot read, thus the use of visuals and sound speak to many.  What used to be very expensive to produce, movies and records, are now much cheaper than books to produce.  Thus, Ms. Vance is recognizing what technology has brought and is using media that students use to benefit themselves and to gain efficiencies.  We can tell and show more cheaply and more effectively than write and print.  Of interest is that this is regarded as an experiment and not the natural order of things.

Rough Posting of Neurochemistry of Learning presentation

February 10, 2010 by · 2 Comments · Uncategorized

I removed the post because of formatting problems and sent it to class members through email.  Comments can still be posted here however.

Notes on Feb 3 week readings

February 8, 2010 by · 2 Comments · Uncategorized

How can we make sense of the flood of information and use it to enhance our lives rather than overwhelm them?  John Seely Brown—Learning in the Digital Age.

Key points:

  1. People learn most effectively in response to need.
  2. Dimensional shifts: a. In addition to text literacy, one needs screen and image literacy; b. Move from receiving lectures and teacher delivery to going out on the web to discover and search related to situated problems; c. Bias toward trying and action rather than reading manuals or taking courses.
  3. Web honors all forms of intelligence—abstract, textual, visual, musical, social, and kinesthetic.  We as teachers have to create and environment that uses the capabilities of the Web to leverage natural ways humans learn.
  4. The Web can enculturate one, rather than teaching about, the person learns to become a member of the field.
  5. The view of delivering information to comparatively passive learners is outdated and simply wrong.  The Web allows students to become active learners with unlimited resources at their disposal.

e-learning 2.0 – how web technologies are shaping education by Steve 0’Hear

  1. Potential through media sharing, blogs, wikis and other social software to create ad-hoc learning communities.
  2. Move toward active learning, students developing knowledge, faculty facilitating and steering versus delivering and testing.

Is Education 1.0 Ready for Web 2.0 Students: John Thompson

  1. Web 2.0 is a read/write medium.  Web 1.0 was seek and get information/Web 2.0 is use, interact and create content.
  2. Potential to change educational model from classroom to asynchronous 24/7 mode.
  3. To date IHEs have not needed to change, but there is competition out there and the new generation will create different approaches to research and collaboration whether we are there or not.  The question is what role will IHE and faculty carve out for themselves.
  4. Duke and DLI doing the same thing.
  5. Use of facebook by campus authorities to monitor for illegal activities sounds like an invasions of privacy.
  6. The recent generations will arrive used to Web 2.0.  They will expect them to be used.

e-Learn: Stephen Downes

  1. The web is a form of chaos.  Learners must learn to discern patterns within chaos.
  2. Structures characterizing life before the Internet are breading down.  People are talking directly to producers and influencing the production process itself.
  3. Web 2.0 is a social revolution rather than technological.  It is about engaging with information, collaborating with others to understand, and developing a new level of awareness.  It is a state of having learning available all the time and accessing it.
  4. It is difficult to realize that one does not have to know something, one can go get it.  One must know how to assess value and combine to communicate.
  5. Move from content consumption to content authoring.

Web 2.0:  A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning:  Bryan Alexander.

  1. Social software; use modification; break away from page metaphor.
  2. Wikis and blogs as streams of conversation.
  3. An article with a tremendous amount in concise form.  Apps covered quickly include YASN, microcontent, RSS feeds, AJAX, folksonomy, tag clouds, social bookmarking, Del.icio.us, Writeboard, Writely, JotSpotLive, Feedster, Daypop, Waypath, PubSub, BlogPulse, Technorati, IceRocket, Zeitgeist, Memeorandum, Google News, Blogdex, Digg, SuprGlu, Gnosh, Flickr, alternate reality games (ARGs).
  4. Author general comments:  Openness—using original mircrocontent with users developing Web content, often collaboratively and often open to he world.  Openness and microcotnent combine into a larger conceptual strand of Web 2.0, one that sees users as playing more of a foundational role in information architecture.
  5. Folksonomic meta data consists of words that users generate and attach to content.
  6. Attach tags and use tag clouds to re-visualize work.
  7. Social bookmarking such as del.icious.us.  Act as outboard memory, a location that store links that might be lost to time; finding people with similar interests, creating tags can offer new perspectives on one’s research, as clusters of tags reveal patterns (or absences) not immediately visible by examining one of several URLs.

Personal comment:  How to work with Web 2.0 apps to get to the point of creating patterns out of chaos.  How to situate a project so that one can learn to use the various techniques.

Where does Web 2.0 fit into my personal theories of ideas on learning:

Learning must be active.  It is not the gathering of knowledge, but what one does with knowledge.  Blogs and wikis and podcasts provide platforms to get views out and submit them to review by an interested group of colleagues.  Content is linked with media, software and hardware.  Learning occurs best when combined with need.  Need can be generated by social contact and reference or by success in using media tools to create content.  Web 2.0 is platform, source, and presentation means.  It is a means to supplement, even replace the traditional classroom to permit learning all the time.

For example, in speaking practice connected with learning a second language, it is important that a record be kept of a perishable moment.  It is also important that learners get feedback from teachers on pronunciation and be required to re-do the session with a focus on correcting what could be bad habits if allowed to continue.  If feasible, I would like to use Facebook as a classroom where speaking samples generated by mobile phone through www.uhaveaudio.com could be listened to over a conferencing system such as Elluminate by the class and teacher and preserved as a kind of voice blog and record of development with the language.

Review of Web 2.0 Sites

February 3, 2010 by · 2 Comments · Uncategorized

http://classic.go2web20.net/

The Complete Web 2.0 Directory.  All kinds of sites. One gets lost in the maze.  But it exemplifies the trait of Web 2.0 as using the web for all kinds of purposes.

http://www.guitartricks.com/

Guitar Tricks offer approximately 1000 stepped videos to learn guitar to the intermediate level.  One pays $12.95 per month to gain acess to  the videos.

http://apps.facebook.com/fluentmyarse/

This site is pretty good for beginning language learning.  The approach is to tell you what you are going to learn in terms of a phrase in a topic domain and then offers several games such as the typing game where it forces one to type quickly and stops you if you are too slow; or the shooting game where you go for the right word sequence.  Fun, demanding, effective, exhausting…  I like it.  I like it too much.  Its addictive.

I want to see if one can create a place on Facebook for language speaking practice where student audio samples are posted and teachers can critique and students can hear each other.  This would progress to virtual pair work on a conferencing system such as Elluminate to include student/teacher interaction with critique and practice.